Most of what you read about rare earths is about mines: a new mine in Australia, a deal in Brazil, a deposit in Greenland. That coverage is accurate, and it covers the least important part of the chain, because rare earths are not actually very rare.

China's share of the world's rare earth mining fell from 97% in 2009 to about 69% in 2025, and in 2024 it still made 94 of every 100 sintered rare earth magnets.1 The gap between those two numbers is the subject of my main piece, why China controls rare earth magnets. This article answers the question hidden in the name. If rare earths are common, what is the scarce part?

The short version is a sentence I use all through the video this article comes from, episode 4 of my 10-layer AI infrastructure series on The Investment Thesis: the digging is a rounding error against the chemistry. The chapters below show why, from the electron that makes the 17 elements look alike to the cost lines in an American mining company's annual report.

Chapter 1

Rare earths are about as common as copper in the Earth's crust

There are 17 rare earth elements, and the common ones sit in the crust at about the same concentration as copper.2 There is more cerium in the Earth's crust than copper, and roughly as much neodymium as copper. Even thulium, the scarcest stable rare earth, is nearly 200 times more common than gold.3

The US Geological Survey calls the name a "historical misnomer" in its own fact sheet.4 The name comes from 18th century chemistry. "Earth" was the old word for a metal oxide. "Rare" came from a Swedish quarry, where the first of these earths was identified in 1794 in a mineral that looked scarce.5

The world is not running out

Everything ever mined in history adds up to about 5.9 million metric tons of rare earth oxides. Stated reserves today are more than 75 million tons, which is about 12.6 times everything we have ever pulled out of the ground.6

So the problem was never finding them. The problem is that geology hands them to you glued together.

Chapter 2

To chemistry, all 17 look alike, and neodymium is only 1.8% smaller than praseodymium

The reason the elements come glued together is a quirk in where the electrons sit. As you move along the row of the periodic table, each new electron drops into an inner shell underneath the outside of the atom. Chemistry only ever sees the outside, so from the outside all 17 look almost the same.7

One thing does change. Each element is very slightly smaller than the one before it. Neodymium and praseodymium, the pair the magnet industry cares about most, differ in size by 1.8%.8

That 1.8% is the whole lever. Every separation plant on Earth exists to turn it into a 99.9% difference in purity.9

Chapter 3

Separating them takes more than 1,000 stages, because each pass is only about 1.5 times purer

The method is called solvent extraction. You wash the dissolved ore against an oily liquid that very slightly prefers the smaller ion. One pass leaves you about 1.5 times purer than you started.10 In the chemist's terms, the oily side ends up about 1.5 times richer in neodymium, relative to praseodymium, than the watery side.

Then you do it again, and again. Chinese researchers at the General Research Institute for Nonferrous Metals put the real number in a 2015 paper: more than 1,000 stages of continuous extraction to separate the individual elements.11

That count is the scarce part of rare earths. Every one of those stages has to hand the next a slightly purer liquid, and the whole chain rests on a size difference of 1.8%.

The rock still travels to the chemistry

Until the middle of 2025, America's only rare earth mine shipped most of what it dug to China for processing, because that is where the separation plants are. MP Materials says so in its own filing, and it stopped those sales in July 2025.12

Chapter 4

At Mountain Pass, the digging is a rounding error against the chemistry

MP Materials' annual filing for its Mountain Pass mine in California puts a price on the two halves of the business. Mining a short ton of ore costs $1.50. Concentrating that same ton of ore costs $51.28. Separating a short ton of the concentrate that comes out costs $1,080.59.13

The digging is a rounding error against the chemistry.

A short ton is 2,000 pounds, the unit MP Materials reports in. The three numbers sit in the same table of the same filing, so the comparison is the company's own. The first two lines are the mine. The third is the chemistry, and it is the largest of the three by far.

This is the lens I keep through the whole rare earth series. In the video I close on it: the mine was never the moat. The chemistry was.

Chapter 5

Light and heavy rare earths split the problem, so look at who separates the heavy ones

Inside the 17 there is one split that matters more than the rest, light against heavy. The light ones, lanthanum, cerium and neodymium, are the common ones, and the world has found plenty of them outside China. The heavy ones, dysprosium and terbium, are the ones a magnet needs to survive heat, and they come overwhelmingly from clay deposits in southern China and Myanmar.14

The price shows the split. In 2025 lanthanum oxide sold for about $1 a kilogram. Terbium oxide sold for $1,010.15 Both come out of the same rock, one element at a time.

The heavy elements are a small share of every rock

Opening more mines helps less on the heavy side, because the heavy elements are a small share of the rock. At Mount Weld in Western Australia, the deposit Lynas mines, lanthanum and cerium, the two cheapest elements on the board, are 68.7% of the reserves. Dysprosium and terbium together are 0.78%.16 It is the same rock from the same hole. The difference is how much of each element the rock holds.

Mountain Pass shows even less on paper. Its resource statement leaves the heavy rare earths out, and the filing says they "are not accounted for in this estimate due to historic data limitations."17

Heat decides which magnets need the heavy elements. A speaker is a static case: the magnet sits still. In a dynamic case such as an electric motor, heat and the magnetic field become a concrete problem, and that is where dysprosium and terbium come in. I cover them in dysprosium and terbium, the heavy rare earths that decide electric motors.

China has drawn the same line. In April 2025 it put 7 rare earth elements under export license, and apart from samarium they sit at the heavy end of the table.18 The dates that followed, and the ones still to come, are in China's rare earth export controls timeline.

What to do with this: the next time you read about a new rare earth mine, ask two questions before you read on. Who separates the ore, and does it carry the heavy elements? It is the question I ask of every layer in the series: where are the bottlenecks, and who sits on them? For rare earths the bottleneck is the separation plant, and the companies that run one outside China, or make magnets there, are in rare earth companies outside China.

Questions people ask

Why are rare earth elements called rare?

The name is a piece of 18th century chemistry. "Earth" was the old word for a metal oxide, and "rare" came from a Swedish quarry, where the first of them was identified in 1794 in a mineral that looked scarce. The US Geological Survey calls the name a historical misnomer, because cerium is more common in the Earth's crust than copper.

Are we running out of rare earths?

No. Everything ever mined adds up to about 5.9 million metric tons of rare earth oxides, and stated reserves are more than 75 million tons, on US Geological Survey figures. That is about 12.6 times everything ever pulled out of the ground.

How are rare earths separated?

By solvent extraction. The dissolved ore is washed against an oily liquid that very slightly prefers the smaller ion, and one pass leaves you about 1.5 times purer than you started. The pass is repeated, and a 2015 paper from China's General Research Institute for Nonferrous Metals puts the count at more than 1,000 stages to separate the individual elements.

Why are rare earths so hard to separate?

The 17 elements look almost the same to chemistry, because each new electron goes into an inner shell underneath the outside of the atom. The one thing that changes is size, and neodymium and praseodymium differ by only 1.8%. Turning that into a 99.9% difference in purity takes more than 1,000 stages.

Is it more expensive to mine rare earths or to separate them?

Separating them, by a wide margin. In MP Materials' filing for its Mountain Pass mine in California, mining a short ton of ore costs $1.50, concentrating it costs $51.28, and separating a short ton of the concentrate costs $1,080.59.

What is the difference between light and heavy rare earths?

The light ones, such as lanthanum, cerium and neodymium, are the common ones, and plenty have been found outside China. The heavy ones, dysprosium and terbium, let a magnet survive heat, and they come overwhelmingly from clay deposits in southern China and Myanmar. In 2025 lanthanum oxide sold for about $1 a kilogram and terbium oxide for $1,010.

Notes

  1. China's mine share: USGS, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2010, Rare Earths, p. 129 (120,000 of 124,000 tons in 2009): https://d9-wret.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets/palladium/production/mineral-pubs/rare-earth/mcs-2010-raree.pdf and USGS, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026, Rare Earths, p. 153 (270,000 of 390,000 tons in 2025, estimated): https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2026/mcs2026-rare-earths.pdf. Magnets: International Energy Agency, Rare Earth Elements: Pathways to secure and diversified supply chains, April 2026, p. 8 (94% of sintered magnets in 2024): https://www.iea.org/reports/rare-earth-elements ↩

  2. The 17 elements: USGS, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026, Scandium, footnote 1: https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2026/mcs2026-scandium.pdf. Concentration: USGS, Fact Sheet 087-02, Rare Earth Elements: Critical Resources for High Technology, 2002, p. 2 ("similar in crustal concentration to commonplace industrial metals such as ... copper"): https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2002/fs087-02/fs087-02.pdf ↩

  3. Cerium and neodymium: USGS, Professional Paper 1802-O, Rare-Earth Elements, 2017, p. O3 ("Cerium ... is actually more common in Earth's crust than is copper") and Table O1: https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1802/o/pp1802o.pdf. Thulium: USGS, Fact Sheet 087-02, 2002, p. 2 ("Even the two least abundant REE (Tm, Lu) are nearly 200 times more common than gold"): https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2002/fs087-02/fs087-02.pdf ↩

  4. USGS, Fact Sheet 087-02, 2002 ("'Rare' earth elements is a historical misnomer"): https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2002/fs087-02/fs087-02.pdf ↩

  5. USGS, Fact Sheet 087-02, 2002, p. 3 (the discovery of the rare earths runs from 1794 to 1907): https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2002/fs087-02/fs087-02.pdf. The quarry at Ytterby, near Stockholm: Stockholm University Baltic Sea Centre, Ytterby elements, periodic table history: https://www.su.se/english/divisions/stockholm-university-baltic-sea-centre/stockholm-university-baltic-sea-centre/hazardous-substances/blog-ytterby-elements-periodic-table-history ↩

  6. Mined in history: the sum of USGS, Rare Earths Statistics, Data Series 140 (world production 1900 to 2020): https://d9-wret.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets/palladium/production/s3fs-public/media/files/ds140-rare-earths-2020.xlsx and the world totals for 2021 to 2025 in USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 2023 to 2026. Reserves: USGS, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026, Rare Earths, version 1.3, 27 May 2026, p. 2 (more than 75,000,000 tons): https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2026/mcs2026-rare-earths.pdf. The 12.6 times is the ratio of the two. ↩

  7. Lyon, K.L., Separation of Adjacent Rare Earth Elements Using Solvent Extraction, MS thesis, University of Idaho, May 2016, pp. 16 to 17 (the added electrons go into the inner 4f orbital): https://objects.lib.uidaho.edu/etd/pdf/Lyon_idaho_0089N_10815.pdf ↩

  8. Lyon 2016, p. 17, Table 1 (ionic radii: praseodymium 1.013, neodymium 0.995 angstroms): https://objects.lib.uidaho.edu/etd/pdf/Lyon_idaho_0089N_10815.pdf ↩

  9. Lyon 2016, p. 4 (magnet grade purity of 99 to 99.9%): https://objects.lib.uidaho.edu/etd/pdf/Lyon_idaho_0089N_10815.pdf ↩

  10. Lyon 2016, pp. 17, 20 and 21 (separation factor for neodymium and praseodymium of about 1.5): https://objects.lib.uidaho.edu/etd/pdf/Lyon_idaho_0089N_10815.pdf ↩

  11. Huang, X.-W., Long, Z.-Q., Wang, L.-S. and Feng, Z.-Y., Technology development for rare earth cleaner hydrometallurgy in China, Rare Metals 34(4), 215 to 222, 2015 ("Separation and purification of individual lanthanide require more than 1000 stages in the continuous extractions"): https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-015-0473-x ↩

  12. MP Materials, Form 10-K for fiscal year 2025, filed 26 February 2026 ("Historically, the Company sold the vast majority of its rare earth concentrate to a single, principal distributor in China"): https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1801368/000180136826000008/mp-20251231.htm ↩

  13. MP Materials, Form 10-K for fiscal year 2025, pit optimization unit costs as of 31 December 2025: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1801368/000180136826000008/mp-20251231.htm. The same costs are in SRK Consulting, SEC 2024 Technical Report Summary Update, Mountain Pass Mine, February 2025, p. 178: https://minedocs.com/28/Mountain-Pass-TR-10012024.pdf ↩

  14. Light and heavy: USGS, Professional Paper 1802-O, 2017, p. O2: https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1802/o/pp1802o.pdf. Clay deposits: International Energy Agency, Rare Earth Elements, April 2026, p. 31: https://www.iea.org/reports/rare-earth-elements ↩

  15. Lanthanum: USGS, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026, Rare Earths, p. 152: https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2026/mcs2026-rare-earths.pdf. Terbium: USGS, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026, Rare Earths, Heavy, p. 1: https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2026/mcs2026-rare-earths-heavy.pdf ↩

  16. Lynas Rare Earths, 2024 Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve Update, Mount Weld, 5 August 2024, Table 7 (lanthanum 23.4% and cerium 45.3% of reserve rare earth oxides, dysprosium and terbium 0.78%): https://wcsecure.weblink.com.au/pdf/LYC/02835257.pdf ↩

  17. SRK Consulting, SEC 2024 Technical Report Summary Update, Mountain Pass Mine, February 2025, p. 23: https://minedocs.com/28/Mountain-Pass-TR-10012024.pdf and MP Materials, Form 10-K for fiscal year 2025, mineral resource notes: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1801368/000180136826000008/mp-20251231.htm ↩

  18. Ministry of Commerce of China and General Administration of Customs, Announcement No. 18 of 2025 (samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium and yttrium): http://english.mofcom.gov.cn/Policies/AnnouncementsOrders/art/2025/art_0dd87cbee7b045bf93fabe6ab2faceee.html. Which elements count as heavy: USGS, Professional Paper 1802-O, 2017, p. O2: https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1802/o/pp1802o.pdf ↩

Sources and further reading

  1. Video: China Has Found Something Better Than Oil, Rare Earths Episode 4, The Investment Thesis on YouTube, www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7_zAL1UE8k
  2. USGS, Rare Earth Elements: Critical Resources for High Technology, Fact Sheet 087-02 (2002), pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2002/fs087-02/fs087-02.pdf
  3. USGS, Professional Paper 1802-O, Rare-Earth Elements (2017), pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1802/o/pp1802o.pdf
  4. USGS, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026: Rare Earths, pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2026/mcs2026-rare-earths.pdf
  5. Lyon, Separation of Adjacent Rare Earth Elements Using Solvent Extraction, University of Idaho (2016), objects.lib.uidaho.edu/etd/pdf/Lyon_idaho_0089N_10815.pdf
  6. Huang, Long, Wang and Feng, Technology development for rare earth cleaner hydrometallurgy in China, Rare Metals 34(4) (2015), doi.org/10.1007/s12598-015-0473-x
  7. MP Materials, Form 10-K for fiscal year 2025, www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1801368/000180136826000008/mp-20251231.htm
  8. International Energy Agency, Rare Earth Elements: Pathways to secure and diversified supply chains (2026), www.iea.org/reports/rare-earth-elements